top of page
Newsletters & Legal Updates
Search


Supreme Court dismisses the appeal, holds that "PICNIC" and "PIKNIK" marks have dissimilar essential features despite the phonetic similarity, no infringement.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in [M/S S.M. Dyechem Ltd vs M/S Cadbury (India) Ltd on 9 May, 2000] held that while "PICNIC" and "PIKNIK" were...
May 2, 2024


KWIK Isn't Yours to Claim: Court Denies Pidilite's Monopoly Over Generic Word
The Delhi High Court in PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD. vs SANJAY JAIN & ANR [C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 371/2022 dated 22nd March, 2024] dismissed...
Apr 21, 2024


Permanent Ban and Damages Against Seller of Fake PUMA Products
The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in PUMA SE vs ASHOK KUMAR TRADING AS R.K. INDUSTRIES [CS(COMM) 616/2022] held that selling counterfeit...
Apr 20, 2024
Join Our Community for Exclusive Content
bottom of page
